El 27/3/2008, a las 8:29, Jeff King escribió:
There may potentially be a "[3/2] change the name of the 'p'atch
command" since it is now not just about the patch (actually, since git
patches _do_ include mode changes, it maybe is appropriate). Wincent
suggested "pick" which I think is reasonable. I'm not planning on
doing
such a 3/2, but I'm sure some industrious soul can make arguments
for or
against changing the name. I will let them handle the ensuing bikeshed
jamboree.
I don't really want to participate in such a jamboree either, but I
will add this one last comment that I should have mentioned in my
previous email: one thing to bear in mind when considering changing
the subcommand name is that "git add" itself has a "--patch" option
since a couple of releases ago, and that means that changing the
subcommand name either means introducing a mismatch between the option
name and subcommand name, or going through a deprecate/rename cycle
for the option name too, which we just introduced.
I don't really care either way. My muscle memory is trained for
"patch" at this point, but changing wouldn't be a problem either.
In any case, your patches 1 and 2 look pretty sane to me.
Cheers,
Wincent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
