Hi, On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Johannes Schindelin schrieb am Sat 22. Mar, 02:33 (+0100): > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Jörg Sommer wrote: > > > > > The current version of git-rebase--interactive shows the user the > > > commits coming from a merge. > > > > > > M---A---B > > > \ \ > > > o---o---+---o branch > > > > > > Rebasing branch on M with preserve merges gives the commits A and B. But > > > if you mark them for editing or remove them the rebase fails. You must > > > keep them as they are. It's useless to bother the user with these > > > commits and might lead to mistakes. > > > > I don't understand. Rebasing with "rebase --onto <something else> M" > > _should_ show A and B. > > But IMO not “rebase --onto <something else> --preserve-merges -i M”. Umm, yes it should. You are asking to transplant everything up to and including M onto something else. Ciao, Dscho