On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Dmitry Potapov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > "git show-branch" has logic very close to what we need here: if you > > give it the names of your current branch and its parent, it'll show > > you just the changes on both branches since the branchpoint. But I > > don't really want to know about additional changes on the parent, only > > on the branch I'm working with, and I often prefer the output to be in > > git-log's (very flexible) format instead of git-show-branch. > > I believe that > > git log parent-branch..local-branch > > should give you exactly what you want, i.e. all changes on your local > branch since it was copied from the parent branch. Then you need to remember what the parent branch was. But: git log local-branch ^maybe-parent-1 ^maybe-parent-2 ... should give you what you want. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
