Re: Invalid refspec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... but there's no particular need to give a 
> different error for "HEAD~1:foo" versus 
> "e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290:foo" based on the presence of a 
> ~.

This is a valid argument in that e83c51... could be (and currently has to
be) a ref name in a fetch refspec.

But we still need to reject something like "HEAD**1:foo".


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux