Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> ... >> > - make the default for autopacklimit rather higher (pick number at >> > random: 50 instead of 20). >> > >> > Rationale: the reason for "git gc --auto" wasn't to keep things >> > perfectly packed, but to avoid the _really_ bad cases. The old default >> > of 20 may be fine if you want to always keep the repo very tight, but >> > that wasn't why "git gc --auto" was done, was it? >> >> I do not think "very tight" was the reason, but on the other hand, my >> personal feeling is that 20 was already 10 too many pack idx files we have >> to walk linearly while looking for objects at runtime. > > Since commit f7c22cc68ccb this is no longer such an issue. Notice that I did not say "19 too many". I know f7c22cc (always start looking up objects in the last used pack first, 2007-05-30) was meant to alleviate the situation, but isn't "no longer" a gross exaggeration? > Note that the current fetch.unpackLimit might play a role as well, > especially if you fetch often (often meaning that you're more likely to > have the received pack exploded into loose objects, or you're > accumulating many small packs). Ah, yes, native fetch will also result in a new pack, so even if you do not do anything else, if you fetch once a day, you will accumulate 20 packs in that many days. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html