"Ping Yin" <pkufranky@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Ping Yin wrote: >> >> > I find it is so annoying to write submodule definition as follows >> > (yeah, only url, without path) >> > >> > ------------------------------ >> > [submodule 'crawler'] >> > url = url1 >> > [submodule 'search'] >> > url = url2 >> > ------------------------------ >> > >> > I think the following form is more simple >> > --------------------------------- >> > [submodule] >> > crawler.url = url1 >> > search.url = url2 >> > --------------------------------- >> > >> > So, could we support such simpler form? >> >> I don't like it at all. Historically, we had much stricter rules on the >> variable names than the second part of the section names. >> >> Also, your suggestion would make things even more confusing than beginners >> already complain Git is. I am not interested in this at all. I would usually say "it is not clear what advantage this has", but in this case, I would rather say "it is clear there is no advantage in this". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
