Hello,
Testing suggests that <name>~0 and <name>~ are the same and are just
synonyms for <name> as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or
by accident?
Shouldn't <name>~0 have [the same] special meaning as <name>^0?
Shouldn't <name>~ be a short-cut for <name>~1, similar to <name>^?
Anyway, I think that at least <name>~0 (useful for scripting) should be
explicitly documented, provided that <name>^0 has special (and
documented) meaning.
[
The question arose when I wanted to write something like this to
automate reverting of a few last revisions:
for i in 0 1 2 3; do
git revert -n HEAD~$i
done
git commit -a
]
-- Sergei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
