Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: proper pack time stamping with --max-pack-size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Runtime pack access is done in the pack file mtime order since recent 
> packs are more likely to contain frequently used objects than old packs.
> However the --max-pack-size option can produce multiple packs with mtime 
> in the reversed order as newer objects are always written first.
>
> Let's modify mtime of later pack files (when any) so they appear older 
> than preceding ones when a repack creates multiple packs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin-pack-objects.c b/builtin-pack-objects.c
> index f504cff..4c2ed70 100644
> --- a/builtin-pack-objects.c
> +++ b/builtin-pack-objects.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>  #include "progress.h"
>  #include "refs.h"
>  
> +#include <utime.h>
> +

Hmmm.  Shouldn't this go to git-compat-util.h?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux