On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:28:07AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > - tr '\000' '\012' <"$1" | sed -e "$sanitize_diff_raw_z" >.tmp-1 > > - tr '\000' '\012' <"$2" | sed -e "$sanitize_diff_raw_z" >.tmp-2 > > + perl -pe 'y/\000/\012/' <"$1" | sed -e "$sanitize_diff_raw_z" >.tmp-1 > > + perl -pe 'y/\000/\012/' <"$2" | sed -e "$sanitize_diff_raw_z" >.tmp-2 > > It might make sense performance-wise to integrate the job of the sed > call into the perl call here. Haven't tested it, though. Probably. My changes were pretty mechanical, and I tried to keep them as small as possible. I'm not sure we care too much about an extra fork in a test script for performance, though it would probably end up more readable. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
