Re: [PATCH 08/11] Allow for having for_each_ref() list some refs that aren't local

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> 
> > This is useful, for example, for listing the refs in a reference 
> > repository during clone, when you don't have your own refs that cover 
> > the objects that are in your alternate repository.
> 
> How about this commit oneline instead:
> 
> 	for_each_ref(): Allow adding extra refs to be traversed
> 
> Hmm?
> 
> You can explain in the body that the SHA-1s are not verified locally, so 
> that you can add extra refs that do not reference local objects.

The non-local aspect is actually that the repository's refs doesn't 
actually include them. We actually do have these objects, in an alternate 
repo. Clearly I need a better commit message, with this info not trying to 
fit in the first line.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux