On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Ping Yin" <pkufranky@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Why would you want to see the bottom one? I still don't understand. > >> > >> And I do not mean this as a rhetorical question. I am here to learn and > >> I would like to make sure that I do not make a suggestion based on wrong > >> understanding of what the user wants to see. > >> > >> I probably am lacking imagination to think of a good use scenario that > >> showing the bottom one would be useful to the user, and you as the author > >> of this patch must thought about what the user want much more than me. > >> > > Showing the bottom one can give the user an impression where > > the submodules goes at first glance if the user is familiar with the > > developing progress of the submodule. > > I think you are talking about the top one (the latest commit), and we both > know that is interesting information to show. I was asking about the most > ancient one, which often is "Initial version of frotz." > Right, we have misunderstood each other in the 'bottom' word. I thought you propose to keep the initial one, and i said the latest one make much sense than the initial one. Now we agree on that keeping the latest commit is enough. -- Ping Yin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
