On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Jeff King wrote: > > I am tracking down a bug in unpack_trees, but I can't seem to find the > exact problem; I'm hoping to get help from people who have touched this > code a bit more than I have. Ok, I haven't (the blame for that unpack_trees function lies mainly at Dscho, I think ;), and now that I'm looking at it more closely I really don't think unpack_trees() is salvageable. I tried. I can't make it work. The only really sane way to traverse trees in parallel is with the walk-tree.c functionality (ie using "traverse_trees()"), which is quite straightforward and rather simple, and which I can pretty much guarantee works. In contrast, the things that unpack_trees() does to try to figure out how to mix in the index into the pot really doesn't work. I'll take a good hard look at trying to convert users of unpack_trees() into traverse_trees(), or perhaps even convert "unpack_trees()" itself. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html