Am 03.03.2008 13:05 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > >> Jakub Narebski schrieb: [...] >>> For me the sign how incredibly fast the git development is is the fact >>> that git version from a year ago is considered "ancient". >> Yes, and that is in itself a problem for people like me who just want to >> use git to get some work done. The time I spend installing new git >> versions, reading RelNotes and sorting through a rather high-volume >> mailing list goes off the time I can spare for working on the Linux >> driver I maintain. :-( > > Well, you do not _have_ to upgrade, if you are comfortable with what you > have... True as far as it goes, and for appropriate values of "what I have". Neither do I _have_ to subscribe to the mailing list, or, for that matter, to read the release notes of a new version I install. But git is not particularly easy to learn on my own, so I end up asking for help. (Arguably this qualifies as "not comfortable with what I have.") And then "ancient version" translates all too easily into "you should upgrade to a newer one". -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@xxxxxxx Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
