"Ping Yin" <pkufranky@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The second patch fixes the inconsistency between "git-diff --raw" and
>> "git-diff-{index,files} --raw" when they are used for submodules.
>>
>> The third one is a bit controversial and changes the semantics and
>> existing callers and won't be considered for 1.5.5.
>>
> Unfortunately, my submodule summary patch series will depend on
> git-diff or git-diff-index. So should i resend my improved patch only
> after the thrid one is applied?
I do not think re-introducing the inconsistency like the third one does is
a palatable option.
Wouldn't grabbing (cd $submodule && git rev-parse HEAD) yourself be more
portable across git before and after the bugfix of "git diff --raw"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
