Jakub Narebski wrote: > On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Sam Vilain wrote: >> Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >>> BTW. the largest git repository is 1.6G OpenOffice.org conversion, >>> with > 2G checkout, and some large binary files under version >>> control. Mozilla and GCC, other large repos, got under 0.5G IIRC. >>> So kernel should be quite smaller. >> I have an 8GB git-svn import of the KDE repository :-) > > First, how large full checkout is? Heh, haven't tried tbh. > And how large Subversion repo? 48GB apparently. This repository is approx. 90% of the subversion repository - I didn't prepare it. > Second, is this repository tightly packed (large window, big delta > chain)? Yes, I don't have the details, though. > And last, KDE repos should most probably be split into submodules. Mmm. Everyone always says that; what it really needs I think is someone to really take the conversion on board and come up with a workable plan on this front. I think the counter-argument to this was "but you always want to have 70% of the repository checked out for development". Counter-counter argument is "yes but they don't always need to be deep clones". Anyway, it's not my baby, just thought I'd let you know about it :-) Sam. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
