Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> This reminds me of the 6d24ad9 (Optimize rename detection for a huge diff) >> topic that reduces the above allocation greatly. Some benching with the >> patch may prove useful to establish much higher limits, I suspect. > > Actually, my timings are about the same. While the patch you mentioned > is nice for reducing the memory consumption, we still have an O(n^2) > loop. Yeah, that one was not about the time but about the space, so it is expected. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
