On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:08:03PM -0500, Kyle Rose wrote: > The rebase just avoids unnecessary merge records. What I really want is my > changes placed on top of whatever the common head is at any one time, which > by design means I would use rebase. Aside from the cleanliness of the > history, I'm not sure there is a real reason to do this. But I like things > clean. ;-) rebase should just reorder the patches in the simple cases, so it should do what you want. Either you've found a bug in rebase or you're doing something unconventional. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
