Re: Minor bug in 'stg edit' ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The only problem it causes is that it shows up as an untracked file if you run 'git status'

I guess this doesn't really matter since you should be using 'stg status' instead, but 'git status' supports colors, so I generally use that instead of 'stg status', since I can interpret the colored output slightly faster than I can scan for ? flags when I want to know if I need to 'stg add' any files before I 'stg refresh'...

Thanks.
-Paul

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:43:53PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 27/02/2008, Paul Donohue <stgit-bug@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm running StGIT 0.14.1
> >
> >  After running 'stg edit', the file '.stgit-edit.txt' is always left behind.
> >
> >  Is this supposed to happen?  I would have assumed the file would be automatically removed after the changes were committed.
> 
> I wouldn't say it's a bug as I never thought it would cause any
> problems if left. Anyway, we could remove it if the operation was
> successful.
> 
> -- 
> Catalin
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux