Hello, On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > As for projects, I imagine that Gitorrent, further builtinification and > > Windows support would be good candidates. > > Yea, Gitorrent would be cool. Especially since send-pack is > somewhat heavy on the server's resources and there are some very > popular projects offered in git format (hello Linux kernel!). I will take this opportunity to add a few comments and promote a page. To help improve chances of success for such a project, perhaps a "community" edition of the protocol is in order. I have been planning (and still are) to do a review of the protocol specification with input from the mailing list. Basically, I am thinking to break the current RFC document into self-contained chunks: a formal introduction + goals, meta file and tracker part, and finally repository serialization and peer wire. In preparation, I started to populate pages at: http://gittorrent.googlecode.com/ If there is interest I will try to find time to restart this process. -- Jonas Fonseca -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
