Hi, On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > My preference are in order: > > > > 1) define an official extension + the && [ -f "$repo" ] > > 2) the && [ -f "$repo"] > > 3) just remove this line > > Sure. (1) sounds sane and if you make the extension ".git", > then I do not think you need anything more ;-). Jokes aside, > calling it .bundle or .bndl would be sane. > > Opinions? I like .bundle, obviously (I used it in every single example I gave). Ciao, Dscho P.S.: only recently, I found out how useful bundles really are. Thanks, Mark, for persisting!
