On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:59:55AM -0600, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, both can do both, right? right. afaik no commands read the remote git config atm, but it might be possible. > darcs send -o will write the data > to send out to a file on disk, and git-send-email will transmit the > message. true. what annoyed me is that i needed net access to generate the file, ie i was not able to do a 'darcs send -o file', copy the file to an usb stick and send it from some other box. > I don't so much care about the default as making it easy for > people that do have a local sendmail or smtpd or (ugh) MAPI client to > send patches automatically, if I tell them what flags to use. but that's the case for git as well :) you should tell people (for example): use "git format-patch origin"; send the created *.patch files and use "git pull --rebase" to avoid an unnecessary merge. - VMiklos
Attachment:
pgp422FM7cfFF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
