Re: [PATCH 1/4] add generic, type aware object chain walker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Martin Koegler <mkoegler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:02:15AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > mkoegler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Martin Koegler) writes:
> > > 
> > > > What about
> > > > #define OBJ_BAD -2
> > > 
> > > You mean "#define OBJ_ANY -2"?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > Should it go into cache.h or should it stay in fsck.h?
> 
> I'd rather see this declared at the end of enum object_type, as
> essentially OBJ_MAX-1.  But Nico may have a different opinion.

Why not alias OBJ_ANY to OBJ_NONE instead?


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux