Re: Instituting feature and infrastructure enhancement proposal window?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > The important dates in the above would be (in parentheses are my
> > straw-mans):
> 
> So I would basically cut you target timeframes into half (except for the 
> first -rc release - there's no point in making that less than a week). 
> Three months is just going to make people who miss the release window 
> antsy. It's what the kernel has in practice, and I would *not* advocate it 
> as ideal - I actually aim for 2 months and we then invariably slip a bit..
> 
> So I'd suggest:
>  - first -rc in 1 week
>  - window closes in 3 weeks
>  - next release in 6 weeks
>  - rinse and repeat

Yea, I agree with Linus suggestion of cutting the time windows
down to closer to 2 months per release.  1.5.4 took a long time.
It doesn't really affect me as I usually run the bleeding edge
'next', but I think most of our users feel warm and fuzzy about
running a released version.  As a community we need to help Junio
get stable releases out more often, so users can benefit from the
improvements we've made.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux