Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:38 -0800
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>, git <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <87oda7o742.wl%cworth@xxxxxxxxxx> (Carl Worth's message of "Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:33:33 -0800")
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Carl Worth <cworth@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>  Does this seem safe enough, Junio?

Neither the earlier one nor this one passes t6030.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
  - From: Carl Worth

References:
- bisect: "won't bisect on seeked tree"
  - From: Mike Galbraith
- [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
  - From: Carl Worth
- Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
  - From: Carl Worth

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] t3404: use configured shell instead of /bin/sh
Next by Date: Re: How change e-mail to use google's gmail instead of machine's prompt?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate confusing "won't bisect on seeked tree" failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux