Chase Venters wrote:
My question is: If you're working on multiple things at once, do you tend to clone the entire repository repeatedly into a series of separate working directories and do your work there, then pull that work (possibly comprising a series of "temporary" commits) back into a separate local master respository with --squash, either into "master" or into a branch containing the new feature?
IMO, that approach scales poorly and involves a lot of overhead.
Or perhaps you create a temporary topical branch for each thing you are working on, and commit arbitrary changes then checkout another branch when you need to change gears, finally --squashing the intermediate commits when a particular piece of work is done?
Spot on. Distribution prune for relevance. Tommy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
