On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:38:31PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > That depends awfully on your definition of "safe". > > I, for one, hate the idea already, that I am "safe" when "git push" does > not do the thing I asked it to, and which it has done for a couple of > years now without complaint, and which I have gotten used to. > > And then, there will be a great confusion for me, since I work on 5 > different machines on an average day, with 5 different git versions, and > having different config settings. Which is worse: pushing more refs than you intended (requiring rewinding refs on a repository that other people may pull from), or pushing fewer refs than you intended, requiring you to run the command a second time? -- -Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@xxxxxxxxx> Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4 B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
