Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > It includes your "continue" fix, since that was actually related to the > "remove_index_entry()" addition this needs. It also contains the hash next > pointer initialization. In the meantime, 'master' will get that single-liner "continue" fix, which may conflict but the resolution is trivial. > But I'm still looking at this. In particular, I want to add some > assertions to make sure the index state matches the name hash state, but > your lazy patch makes that less convenient. Please feel free to revert it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
