On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> struct branch *branch = branch_get(NULL); > > > > Shouldn't this be branch_get(new->name)? > > Perhaps. > > > ... > > While not uncommon colloquially, "behind of" is not grammatically > > correct. "behind" is a preposition, so the "of" is redundant (it is > > necessary in the top string because "ahead" is an adverb). > > Thanks. > > -- >8 -- > > Ask branch_get() for the new branch explicitly instead of > letting it return a potentially stale information. I think it would be good to update current_branch in remote.c when we change branches, just on principle, but we also might as well not depend on that here. > Tighten the logic to find the tracking branch to deal better > with misconfigured repositories (i.e. branch.*.merge can exist > but it may not have a refspec that fetches to .it) > > Also fixes grammar in a message, as pointed out by Jeff King. > > The function is about reporting and not automatically > fast-forwarding to the upstream, so stop calling it > "adjust-to". > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > builtin-checkout.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin-checkout.c b/builtin-checkout.c > index f51b77a..19413eb 100644 > --- a/builtin-checkout.c > +++ b/builtin-checkout.c > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int merge_working_tree(struct checkout_opts *opts, > return 0; > } > > -static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *opts) > +static void report_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *opts) > { > /* > * We have switched to a new branch; is it building on > @@ -306,13 +306,13 @@ static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *op > int rev_argc; > int num_ours, num_theirs; > const char *remote_msg; > - struct branch *branch = branch_get(NULL); > + struct branch *branch = branch_get(new->name); > > /* > * Nothing to report unless we are marked to build on top of > * somebody else. > */ > - if (!branch || !branch->merge) > + if (!branch || !branch->merge || !branch->merge[0] || !branch->merge[0]->dst) branch->merge[i] can't actually be NULL; all of the allocated space in the array gets stuff stored in it. > return; > > /* > @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *op > remote_msg, base, > num_ours, (num_ours == 1) ? "" : "s"); > else if (!num_ours) > - printf("Your branch is behind of the tracked%s branch '%s' " > + printf("Your branch is behind the tracked%s branch '%s' " > "by %d commit%s,\n" > "and can be fast-forwarded.\n", > remote_msg, base, > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void update_refs_for_switch(struct checkout_opts *opts, > remove_branch_state(); > strbuf_release(&msg); > if (!opts->quiet && (new->path || !strcmp(new->name, "HEAD"))) > - adjust_to_tracking(new, opts); > + report_tracking(new, opts); > } > > static int switch_branches(struct checkout_opts *opts, > -- > 1.5.4.2.261.g851a5 > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html