Hi, On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Anatoly Yakovenko wrote: > > > *.*.*.*- foobar [18/Feb/2008:16:40:12 -0800] "PROPFIND /git/repo > > > HTTP/1.1" 301 320 > > > > Try adding a / at the end of the url you use for your repo. > > ah cool, that was it. The initial push seems to have worked, > > $ git push -v upload master > Pushing to http://aeyakovenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx/git/repo/ > Getting pack list > Fetching remote heads... > refs/ > refs/tags/ > refs/heads/ > 'refs/heads/master': up-to-date > > > but i cant clone or just normally push and pull the repo. That's not correct. You can clone, push and pull the repo. > $ git-pull > fatal: 'origin': unable to chdir or not a git archive > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Since you did not clone from anywhere, the remote "origin" is not set. You will have to do that yourself: git remote add -f origin http://aeyakovenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx/git/repo/ > $ git-clone http://aeyakovenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx/git/repo/ foobar > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/aeyakovenko/projects/foobar/.git/ > cat: /home/aeyakovenko/projects/foobar/.git/refs/remotes/origin/master: > No such file or directory > /usr/bin/git-clone: line 450: cd: > /home/aeyakovenko/projects/foobar/.git/refs/remotes/origin: No such > file or directory > fatal: : not a valid SHA1 > fatal: Not a valid object name HEAD That smells like another "master"-less repository. Why do people do that? Isn't it just _easier_ and more _hassle-free_ to just accept that the initial branch is called "master"? Hth, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
