Re: [PATCH] Remove useless if-before-free tests.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"David Symonds" <dsymonds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2008 1:58 PM, Jim Meyering <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This change removes all useless if-before-free tests.
>> E.g., it replace code like this
>>
>>         if (some_expression)
>>                 free (some_expression);
>>
>> with the now-equivalent
>>
>>         free (some_expression);
>>
>> It is equivalent not just because POSIX has required free(NULL)
>> to work for a long time, but simply because it has worked for
>> so long that no reasonable porting target fails the test.
>> Here's some evidence from nearly 1.5 years ago:
>>
>>     http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031544.html
>
> That's not great evidence. It only tests 9 systems, and misses several

If you mean mingw, cygwin, and M$-based ones, they're all ok.
As far as I know, you have to go back to SunOS4 to find a system on which
free(NULL) fails.  That OS stopped being a reasonable porting target
a couple years ago.

> targets that Git already runs on. It seems like a fairly minor cleanup
> for a definite loss of portability.

It's a definite loss of portability if you can find a reasonable porting
target for which free(NULL) fails.  But even if you do, the fix is
not to reject the clean-up, but to amend it with a wrapper function.
That encapsulates the work-around in one place rather than polluting
all of those files.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux