Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> It is equivalent not just because POSIX has required free(NULL) to work >> for a long time, but simply because it has worked for so long that no >> reasonable porting target fails the test. Here's some evidence from >> nearly 1.5 years ago: >> >> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031544.html > >>From this mail, we see that there is at least one target where this leads > to a crash (remember, git should run on more platforms than Wine). Hi, Thanks for the feedback. FYI, you don't have to go back 20+ years to 3BSD to find a system on which free(NULL) fails :-) SunOS4's did, too. So if that is a reasonable porting target for git, then you will need the wrapper. With references to "SunOS" in Makefile and configure, I did wonder about that. Let me know and I'll adjust the proposed patch. > However, such a crash is pretty obvious in our test-suite, I guess, and > thus we could easily introduce something like this into git-compat-util.h > should the need ever arise: > > #ifdef FREE_NULL_CRASHES > inline void gitfree(void *ptr) > { > if (ptr) > free(ptr); > } > #define free gitfree > #endif > > IOW I like that type of cleanup. :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html