Re: Intoducing the .git file (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 17, 2008 11:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote:
>
> > PPS: If included, the .git file should probably be used by git-submodule
> > to clone submodule repositories into something like
> > $GIT_DIR/submodules/<name>, as that would make local submodule changes
> > more resistant to dataloss due to checkout/reset in the containing
> > repository.
>
> I don't buy that argument.  For the moment, the submodules are
> self-contained repositories.  The superproject does not even have to have
> a single object contained in a submodule.  I'd try to keep that
> separation.

They would still be separated and self-contained repositories, but
with my suggestion the submodule repository would be moved out of the
working tree of the containing repository. Which I believe is a good
thing, especially when you switch from one branch in the containing
repository which had the submodule in './foo' to another branch where
the submodule is located in './lib/foo'.

--
larsh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux