Re: [PATCH] Validate nicknames of remote branches to prohibit confusing ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> ...
>> > I was sort of expecting you to just put this in yourself, but since you 
>> > haven't, I wrote it up as an actual patch and fixed the polarity of the 
>> > test for slashes.
>> 
>> Thanks.  I am bogged down in day-job these days and have been
>> down-sick for the past 36 hours.
>
> No problem. It's an easy enough patch, and the test suite found the bug in 
> the original version. I just wanted to make sure it didn't get forgotten 
> on account of never getting a patch emailled to the list.

Actually I have been slowly trying to give up on being in the
business of tying up loose ends left by everybody.  I used to
touch-up and finish obvious loose ends and add tests myself to
patches from many people, and I still try to do so when able,
but as contributor base gets larger, doing so to all incoming
patches is starting to become unfeasible, and it is not quite
fair to me (and my wife ;-)).

So in that sense, yes it was getting forgotten, waiting for a
"this is the final revision, apply it" message from you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux