Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jakub,

On Thursday 14 of February 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote:

> >> What is the size of checkout, by the way?
> >
> > 2.4G
>
> That's huuuuge tree. Compared to that 1.6G (or 1.4G) packfile doesn't
> look large.
>
> I wonder if proper subdivision into submodules (which should encourage
> better code by the way, see TAOUP), and perhaps partial checkouts
> wouldn't be better solution than lazy clone. But it is nice to have
> long discussed about feature, even if at RFC stage, but with some code.

Yes, I'd love to see the OOo tree split into several parts, I've already 
proposed a division (http://www.nabble.com/OOo-source-split-td13096065.html), 
but it'll take some more time I'm afraid :-(

Regards,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux