On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > The result is: > > > > $ ls -la objects/pack/pack-e4dc6da0a10888ec4345490575efc587b7523b45.pack > > -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1638490531 2008-02-14 17:51 > > objects/pack/pack-e4dc6da0a10888ec4345490575efc587b7523b45.pack > > > > 1.6G looks much better than 2.4G, wouldn't you say? Jan, if you want it, > > please give me a place to upload it to. > > Brandon Casey wrote: > > > I have successfully repacked this repo a few times on a 2.1GHz > > system with 16G. > > > > The smallest attained pack was about 1.45G (1556569742B). > > Hmmm... I wonder if packv4 would help... No. Well, it would help a bit, maybe in the 10-20% range, but nothing as significant as going from 2.6G to 1.5G, or like in the GCC case, from 1.3G to 230M. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
