Re: git-branch -m interprets first argument differently when two are supplied

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
> > 
> >> It's the two argument case that both expects its arguments in a 
> >> different order than other commands _and_ is dangerous in the case of 
> >> -M.
> > 
> > The order was specifically requested, as "mv" also has that order.
> 
> Did you even read the original message? You point this out like it 
> hasn't already been mentioned.

Yes, I had read it, but I had the impression that the rationale for the 
current behaviour made a heck of a lot of sense.

> >Don't use it, if you don't know what you're doing.
> 
> Gee, thanks for the advice.

You're welcome, as always.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux