On Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 17:45:16 (-0800) David Symonds writes: >On Feb 13, 2008 5:39 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 1) git-branch -d <branchname> complains if <branchname> hasn't been >> merged to HEAD. Shouldn't it really only complain if <branchname> >> hasn't been merged into any local branch? i.e., as long as >> <branchname> has been merged, why care to which branch? > >It's easy to mistype branch names, and you typically only delete them >after you merge them into your current branch. If you're really sure, >just pass -D instead of -d. How does that answer the question posed? Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
