Sebastian,
I think you have the right idea.
One last question
If a person wants to work on a tag branch, would the right idea be to
create new branch on it as to not screw up the previous tag?
On Feb 11, 2008, at 2:47 AM, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:56:11AM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2008.02.09 20:44:59 -0600, Sam Granieri Jr wrote:
Right now, git-svn import (or clone) will convert tags and
branches as
remote branches.
I would like it if git could pick up subversion tags and translate
them
as git tags upon importing
SVN tags aren't like git tags. A "tag" in SVN is just another
directory,
which you can modify at will.
Well, a SVN tag could be represented as a Git branch _and_ a Git tag
pointing to the head of that branch. Whenever any such "tag branch"
advances, the user should be notified, the user responsible for the
further commits to the SVN "tag" should be seriously hurt and the Git
tag should be overwritten (git tag -f).
Sam, is that basically what you want?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://
tokkee.org/
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin
Franklin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
