Re: limiting rename detection during merge is a really bad idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:55:07AM +0100, Marco Costalba wrote:

> On Feb 11, 2008 8:48 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It may also be that multiple rename limits are appropriate. I don't mind
> > waiting 30 seconds for rename detection during a particularly tricky
> > merge. I probably do when running 'git-log -p'.
> >
> 
> That's exactly my point: ignoring diff.renamelimit in case of merges.

I think you missed my point. You never want to _ignore_ it. You want to
set it higher.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux