Hi, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'm starting to free up some resources to look at the interesting > problem with screwed-up commit dates confusing our commit walker into > thinking that some uninteresting commit isn't actually uninteresting due > to not traversing the uninteresting chain deep enough. I was thinking the other night why I did not like the generation header. And I found out why: it is redundant information. So why not have some local "cache" which maintains the generation numbers for the commits? (Much like the "notes" cache I showed last year?) Hmm? Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
