Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,

One more 'thank you' for the review - now publically :-)

On Friday 08 February 2008 22:52, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > > <bikeshedding>maybe remote-alternates (note the dash instead
> > > of the underscore)</bikeshedding>
> >
> > Why not in info/alternates?
>
> Again, to make the distinction clear.

Yes; still even though the 'alteranates' and 'remote alternates' have some of 
the ideas common, the implementation differs (and has to differ) - so I think 
you are right even in the --lazy option for clone instead of reusing -s.

For the rest - I'll post the updated patch ASAP.

Regards,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux