Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Poole <mdpoole@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> British courts, for instance, have held that copying a program into
> RAM for the purposes of executing it is a right reserved under
> copyright law.  In the US, 17 USC 117(c) and (d) were added after a
> court held (in MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer) that a computer repair
> company violated copyright of software that automatically started on a
> computer it was asked to repair -- by simply allowing the computer to
> boot and execute that program automatically.
>
> As the GPL itself notes, you are not required to accept it, but
> nothing else grants you the right to perform actions reserved to
> copyright holders with respect to the work.

I think that most countries will grant some right to the purchaser of a
physical copy of copyrighted material.  For example, I doubt there are
countries where it is prohibited to read a book you have bought (via a
channel authorized by the copyright holder) when it contains no explicit
license granting you the right to read it.

-- 
David Kastrup

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux