Re: [PATCH] Make git prune remove temporary packs that look like write failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 6, 2008 8:16 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, David Tweed wrote:
> > Ah, I hadn't realised this was an intended usage of --expire. Since as
> > you note there's no way to tell an abandoned tmp pack from one that's
> > in the process of being written, following expire is probably
> > necessary for safety. I'll look at adding support for that.
>
> Did you miss Johannes ' patch?  He posted it yesterday and you were even
> CC'd. It did exactly that on top of yours already.

I had missed it (I've only just started reading email). Thanks for
pointing it out.



-- 
cheers, dave tweed__________________________
david.tweed@xxxxxxxxx
Rm 124, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading.
"while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." --
attempted insult seen on slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux