Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> Follow the same logic as for loose objects when removing stale packs: they >> might be in use (for example when fetching, or repacking in a cron job), >> so give the user a chance to say (via --expire) what is considered too >> young an age to die for stale packs. >> >> Also add a simple test to verify that the stale packs are actually >> expired. >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> > > Nicolas They are not "stale packs", but temporary files that wanted to become pack but did not succeed. Perhaps "stale temporary packs"? Shouldn't we do something similar to objects/pack/pack-*.temp files and objects/??/*.temp that http walker leaves? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
