On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > I suggested that: to prevent the index from needing an update. > > > > > > This is quite important if you have a large working tree, and switch > > > branches from A to B. For example, "make" will punish you where it > > > hurts. > > > > This isn't used for switching branches; this is used for checking out > > paths. If you do "git checkout <not-head> -- <every single path>", make > > will punish you, but why would you do that? I'd guess that people are > > unlikely to have a significant number of non-changes in this piece of > > code, just because they wouldn't list things that they didn't think had > > changes. > > For convenience, you can also say > > $ git checkout -- <path> > > and expect checkout to not really touch the unchanged files. That also doesn't use this function, which is only for reading the tree into the index if a tree is given. On the other hand: $ git checkout HEAD -- . With either git-checkout.sh or my code, touches all of your files. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html