Re: [PATCH 3/9] Send unpack-trees debugging output to stderr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> 
> >  #if DBRT_DEBUG > 1
> >  		if (first)
> > -			printf("index %s\n", first);
> > +			fprintf(stderr, "index %s\n", first);
> >  #endif
> 
> This code path is only affected when DBRT_DEBUG is defined ("Daniel 
> Barkalow's Roasted Tomatoes"?).  So technically, I do not really see why 
> this is part of this patch series...

"Daniel Barkalow's read_tree" (which is what that code was called when it 
was added). I needed to enable this debugging in order to debug this 
series, and found that enabling debugging caused tests to fail, so I fixed 
that in the series. To the extent that this matters at all, having it in 
the series that could need debugging makes sense.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux