Re: Possible kinder GIT-VERSION-GEN?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, February 4, 2008 at 13:59:25 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes:
>Bill Lear <rael@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I have my home directory under git control, and I have a build
>> directory (not tracked by git) under my home directory into which I
>> untar files and then in which I build things, including git.
>
>Let me make sure I understand you by rephrasing.  You are
>extracting git tarball as an untracked subdirectory in an
>unrelated project, and GIT-VERSION-GEN misbehaves.  One such
>misbehaviour is that it adds -dirty.

Yes, that is correct.

>And I think you are right.  The -dirty suffix should be relative
>to the output of "git describe".  Version string derived from
>any other codepath should not get the suffix, simply because we
>do not even know if it is dirty.  In fact, we should not even
>attempt to run that diff-index to figure out if it is dirty.

Ok, I trust you know what you are talking about with git-describe.:-)


Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux