Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Gaah. This is that stupid apporach.

.. and it won't actually solve the problem you pointed to. It's not enough 
that the positive commits should be connected to the negative ones, the 
problem is that no negative ones could possibly connect to the positives. 

So scratch that patch as broken too. 

Really annoying. It does look like we really want to check the *totally* 
connected case, and we simply cannot do the "two unconnected trees" 
decision case without traversing both trees fully (since we won't know 
that they are *really* unconnected until we do).

And that seems really quite expensive. I wonder if I've missed something 
again.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux