On Feb 4, 2008 1:24 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > For now I haven't picked up any of the "how about this way" > > revisions. > > Yeah, I think all my comments have been addressed... Lars, care to send a > new version? Sure, but we should come to a conclusion on "GITDIR" vs. "GIT_DIR" vs. "gitdir" vs. "directory" vs. "ref". The reason I used "GITDIR" was to keep the door open for additional parameters in the "gitfile" (but it should obviously have been "GIT_DIR" for that usage since its value is used to specify $GIT_DIR). If it's more likely that we'll use this as a general substitute for symlinks, I think "ref" is better due to the existing symbolic refs. My preference would be "GIT_DIR" (or "git_dir") since we also might want the "WORKDIR_HASH" Shawn mentioned. -- larsh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
