* Sat 2008-02-02 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Message-Id: 20080202161813.GA19797@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 02:59:43PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>> I use HEAD~1 always, because I think the consistency in learning the
>> most important factor.
>>
>> It does not matter what advanced users use. The documentation should
>> primarily focus the newcomers.
>
> That could have been an argument for disallowing the HEAD^ syntax
> entirely, but it's too late for that.
>
> Even if we eradicated all mention of ^ from the in-tree documentation,
> it would still show up in lots of out-of-tree documentation and
> examples. So we have to introduce it to newbies. Fortunately, it isn't
> that hard.
>
> One way we can help them is by continuing to mix the two in examples, so
> let's continue with the current mixture.
Yeah let's continue as usual. And every time you need to explain the
difference, when you could just teach one. The is no doubt that
HEAD~N
is superior to
HEAD^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Count that. Optimizing keystrokes is hardly ever a brilliant idea from
learning perspective.
Jari
--
Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
